Friday, December 1, 2017
Thursday, November 9, 2017
Friday, August 11, 2017
A Controversy
Union College, where he was an Eliphalet Nott Scholar. Attending the State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center in the Combined-Degree Program, he received both a M.D. and Ph.D. degree in 1973 doing research in embryology. This was followed by a residency in Obstetrics and Gynecology at Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami and a fellowship in Maternal-Fetal Medicine at the University of Florida. He was board certified in both fields and had been on the faculty of the University of Florida since 1977.
Saturday, August 5, 2017
The Passing of Friends
Monday, September 26, 2016
OCTOBER 15th WALK TO REMEMBER
I began my work in this area in 1978, which is now 38 years ago. At that time, SHARE was just beginning to take off under Jane Marie Lamb, and the most popular books were Peppers and Knapp Motherhood and Mourning, Kotzwinkle's Swimmer in a Secret Sea, and Glen Davidson's Death of the Wished for Child.
Thirty eight years later, it is astounding how far everyone has come and what has been accomplished: many dissertations and significant research projects, the Missing Angels Bills in a number of legislatures, support now available in almost every hospital worldwide, and SHARE even fared just fine after the very sad death of Sr. Jane. IF there were one irreplaceable person in the field it would have been her, and I know she would be so pleased to see what became of the Walk to Remember, Memorial Services, and in-hospital care.
I counted her as a friend though we did not know each other well, we have some long conversations about grief and mourning, God, and the world back then: she was always a welcoming and edifying person. Blessings to all of you who followed in her footsteps, and continued the great work once started: So many parents with a listening ear now, so many lives saved and healed. Be blessed on October 15th.
Saturday, December 13, 2014
Tuesday, October 8, 2013
The Forgotten Grief: New Feature
Sunday, August 18, 2013
there is currently appearing online a wattpad blog calling itself forgotten grief.
I am NOT associated with them and know nothing of their work. THE FORGOTTEN GRIEF has been around since 1980 when i first published the title and has always been associated with my 32 years of research writing and conferences.
Please note the difference. Elizabeth Kirkley Best Ph.D
Monday, August 5, 2013
Not an Endorsement
A short time ago, I found that a quote of mine from The Forgotten Grief regarding the grieving of parents was being used on the front page of amemorial garden called "Little Spirits Garden". The quote was correct, and was not used in any wrong way, but its prominent feature on the site of the page made it look like an endorsement of the Vancouver "Little Spirits Garden" a place where stillborn babies are laid to rest.
While it may seem insensitive to write this I feel that I must, since the quote, which while legally used in some respects (any one can quote anything up to 400 words), in other ways appears far too much like an endorsement.
I know very little about Little Spirits Garden except that the premise of the place is based upon a philosophy and semi-religious, 'new age' base, which I do not share, and cannot endorse. I have asked them three times to consider the use of other material rather than mine which has a Christian worldview, though many people from many walks of life use the material. They have agreed but never take it down, so I feel that I have no choice but to express my non-endorsement of the project: my work in the Christian community and my faith in God necessitate integrity and a knowledge of where I stand on certain issues.
Whether the very little babies should be buried in separate sections or in family sections is of course a matter of private choosing: there are positive and negative points to both: this is not really the issue. My particular feeling is that a family is a family and should be buried together, and the identity and integrity of the child's life should be preserved in death. Not all people though have family plots, and there are many other reasons for making another decision which are perfectly legitimate: it has to do with parental choice, of which I have always been an advocate.
However, the occultic nature of the approach to this particular memorial garden, would cause me never to offer an endorsement based upon my own work, and knowledge of the Word of God. While they may keep the quote against my will on the front page of their site, I likewise feel free to write this post acknowledging my displeasure at it. In this way no one's choices are hampered.
In professional work with perinatal bereavement we seldom admit or acknowledge our faith or beliefs, but that is in some ways a form of hypocrisy and not objectivity because dealing with parents and the death of infants inherently involves beliefs and doctrine. This was one of the reasons I left psychology for more ministerial concerns, to better aid parents since most of their most troubling questions were about their infants well-being in eternal life. It is for this reason, that this post is written, and not to dissuade any one from making other choices, but to make clear, that the position of the above memorial garden, is not mine.
Elizabeth (Libbie) Kirkley Best, PhD
Director, THE FORGOTTEN GRIEF
Thursday, January 17, 2013
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Note: From Elizabeth Kirkley Best PhD
The Forgotten Grief: Questions
|
Thursday, January 5, 2012
On Santorum and Mourning a Stillbirth
A response to the 'weird' criticism of Santorum
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/01/05/partisan-politics-santorum-stillborn-baby/
I worked with families grieving stillborns for many years in regional care facilities and in the community. Each parent and family grieve very differently and in a society bereft of understanding regarding death and mourning, it is little surprise to find no understanding regarding the mourning of a stillborn son or daughter. Parents need closure and time to say good bye, a feat usually briefly accomplished in a hospital's cold and clinical setting: if the Santorums had the great grace of quietly saying good bye in their home, then they are the blessed ones: our society cannot possibly address in its hardheartedness the enormous strength of character it takes to live through the death of a stillborn, and to go on to maintain a healthy and strong marriage and family, and then even contend for the highest office of the land: it is a sign of character and fortitude. The decision to see and hold and say quiet good byes to the smallest member of the family is healthy, expected, and waylays later possible emotional problems: it is called 'closure' and is not weird nor odd, but an expression of love with tears and in my estimation a clear sign of a strong candidate who values life at all ages. Many blessings to a fine candidate.
Sunday, July 31, 2011
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
September 6th : Stillbirth Remembrance Day
Over the years, so much has been accomplished in the remembrance of the little ones who died at birth, and to comfort their parents and families. "The Forgotten Grief" joins in the official day of remembrance, in honoring the tiny lives and the impact they have made in their deaths, on the nation, the heart and their families. As we enter in to the new school year, the High Holy Days for the Jewish community, the Commemoration of the 911 tragedy, and the fall season, let us always keep in our hearts, that in God's sovereignty even the lives cut short, or as scripture denotes them "the infants of days" had purpose and meaning. Many blessings to all those who have loved and lost their stillborn sons and daughters, and many congratulations to those who have tirelessly worked over the past 30 years, that they not be forgotten.
Elizabeth Kirkley Best PhD
The Forgotten Grief
www.forgottengrief.com
Friday, July 23, 2010
Grief at Prenatal Loss: An Argument for the Earliest Maternal Attachment: Online version
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Notice: Terra Coggin's Group Announces Infant loss Awareness day
Terra-Lynn invited you to "Lights of Love International Wave of Light 2010" on Friday, October 15, 2010 at 7:00pm.
Event: Lights of Love International Wave of Light 2010
What: Ceremony
Start Time: Friday, October 15, 2010 at 7:00pm
End Time: Friday, October 15, 2010 at 8:00pm
Where: everywhere (Worldwide)
To see more details and RSVP, follow the link below:
http://www.facebook.com/n/?event.php&eid=171146237060&mid=21c504cG251bdeeaG4420e24G7&n
Sunday, August 23, 2009
New Studies on Subsequent Children: Revisiting the 'Replacement Child Syndrome': The Studies did not find 'no effect'.
Recently in the news, there was widespread coverage of a research study by Dr. Penelope Turton in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry regarding the effects on the next child following a stillbirth.
A summary article appears at Stillbirth Not an Issue for Next Born in Forbes.com
Some are misreading both the study and misapplying the findings to suggest that there is no risk in the pregnancy subsequent to a stillbirth for the child born later. This seemed to negate the observation of hundreds of researchers and counselors who have noted for 50 years the existence of what has been termed the 'replacement child syndrome', a phenomenon in which many feelings about the 'ideal' child that died are overlaid on the feelings regarding the next child who survives. Many historical examples have been noted of pathological examples in which the 'new' child cannot live up to the expectations of what the previous child would have been like.
The actual findings in the new 2009 study in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and a previous article in Attachment and Human Behavior, included the following statements in the two abstract:
We report that in this population there was no significant correspondence between U and PTSD scores or caseness and no association between maternal PTSD and infant D. We discuss possible interpretations of these findings.
Recent Study: Results: There were no significant between-group differences in child cognitive or health assessments, or in teacher-rated child difficulties. However, mothers with history of stillbirth (the index group) reported increased child difficulties, in particular peer problems, and more adverse interaction was observed in respect of higher levels of maternal criticism of the child's actions, more overall controlling behaviour by the mother, a less harmonious emotional atmosphere and a lower level of maternal engagement with the child. Some of these effects appeared to be mediated by maternal perinatal psychological symptoms and family breakdown.
Two major issues of are deep concern to the research and comfort community in Perinatal bereavement:
1. The study in no way says there are no differences at all: the study says there are no differences in teacher rated child difficulties, but that there are a number of differences in maternal reports! Serious differences contrary to the way the study was reported.
2. A fundamental error that is made in the social sciences among those who are doing field research is that when we find no significant difference between groups or measures, in this case, no difference between subsequent children following stillbirth vs regular children in teacher-ratings, we cannot say at all that there are no differences, only that we cannot support the 'Null' hypothesis.
In research especially field research (research that takes place in a natural setting, and not in a lab), countless variables and possible errors may confound our results. These natural 'errors' may exaggerate our data, or cause it to look like there are no differences when there really are. It is a common and deadly error over the years in Perinatal Bereavement research and must be heeded. Even those in their first quarter of college statistics learn that when we do not see a statistically significant difference, it does not mean that there was not one, only that it did not appear given our methodology and choice of statistical test. There can be many reasons that there appears to be no difference:
1. Raw Error
2. Unknown factors
3. Faulty methods such as poorly designed rating scales or assessments
4. The wrong statistical test, or the right one, lacking power or enough data
5. Confounding factors such as nonrandom selection, a common problem in field research, historical factors, meaning that either during the study an event happens which changes the data, or for example a difference in parity, maternal age, or time since loss which might not have randomized out.
6. Design facts
and others.
For this reason, virtually all Statisticians and trained researchers know that they cannot draw conclusions and say there are 'no differences' just because a statistically significant difference was not found. Two studies which did the same thing, concluded 'no differences' when they should not have, were that of Peppers and Knapp in the early 1980s who claimed to have found no difference in grief between women who lost babies in the first, second or third trimester, (which is not logical to those who have worked with many mothers) or a study by Kellner et. al[: Links
Kellner KR, Donnelly WH, Gould SD. Parental behavior after perinatal death: lack of predictive demographic and obstetric variables.Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Jun;63(6):809-14. ]
in which a less powerful statistic found 'no differences' when all they should have said was that they were unable to detect one. They used a chi square instead of a multivariate design, and seemed to contradict the earlier study of Kirkley-Best (1981), the first prospective and controlled study, which yield a significant difference with the highest predictive variable being length of gestation, followed by maternal parity. The Kirkley Best study has been replicated twice, by an extensive Swedish study [5], and another stateside.
The reason for this caution is that
1. The study actually did find a difference in maternal report, supporting all earlier observations (See The Forgotten Grief: A Review of the Psychology of Stillbirth-section on 'Replacement Child Syndrome' and
2. Designs out in the field can almost never conclude 'no difference'.
The reason this is so significant is because the study rapidly hit the news services and appeared to negate the warning of so many researchers and counselors, including myself of the insidious effects of perinatal mourning on subsequent children and family relations. It is not that healthy families cannot compensate for their feelings in later births, nor does it indicate that the effects are always severe, but even 'face validity' tells that the feelings about a child that died will affect feelings about the child who comes next! The example is often given of Vincent Van Gogh, whose mother even named him after the deceased sibling and had him visit the grave on a regular basis. While that is an extreme and pathological example, it indicates that the process does attend future children, and needs to be addressed.
This is not to say it is a poor or unimportant study, but the more appropriate question to be asked, how to get at the variables affecting the severity of the 'carry over' feelings, so as not to hamper the child's development later, and to avoid such traumatizing issues as using the same name or 'suspending' a name for a later child, or any thing which causes each child, living or dead not to retain a God given identity.
A last note quickly so that I do not slip into my old moronic psychology professor self: I have no vested interest any longer in research issues or diagnostic issues,as I left the research a few years back since in this particular field, research yield almost nothing that careful observation could not, with out reducing grief and sorrow over the loss of an infant to yet one more problem of clinical pathology. My greater concern is that healthy happy wholesome children and families find their way through despair and mourning, while retaining the dignity and unique 'glory' of each child, including the one who died. Just a passing note:
1Cr 15:41 [There is] one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars: for [one] star differeth from [another] star in glory.
________________________________
1. Forbes.com
2. Penelope Turton 1 , William Badenhorst 1 , Susan Pawlby 2 , Sarah White 1 , and Patricia Hughes "Psychological vulnerability in children next-born after stillbirth: a case–control follow-up study" Division of Mental Health, St George's University of London, UK ; Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
Correspondence to Penelope Turton, Division of Mental Health, St George's University of London
3.Penelope Turton; Patricia Hughes; Peter Fonagy; David Fainman
journal Attachment & Human Development, Volume 6, Issue 3 September 2004 , 241 - 253
4. Kellner KR, Donnelly WH, Gould SD. Parental behavior after perinatal death: lack of predictive demographic and obstetric variables.Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Jun;63(6):809-14.
5.Ingela Radestad, Gunnar Steineck, Conny Nordin, Berit Sjogren, associate BMJ 1996;312:1505-1508 (15 June)Papers Psychological complications after stillbirth--influence of memories and immediate management: population based study
6 Peppers LG, Knapp RJ. Psychiatry. 1980 May;43(2):155-9.
Maternal reactions to involuntary fetal/infant death.
7. Kirkley Best E. Grief in response to prenatal loss: An argument for the earliest maternal attachment EK Best - 1981 -Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Florida
Monday, March 23, 2009
Forgotten Grief: Update
The Petite Dress
I would have clothed you
I want you to know
In this hour of despair
In my weeping
With the Satins and Silks
And Luminous Linens
Of Fairy Tales
I would have held you
Cradled in attendant arms
In Holy Dedication
Promising Our God
A Life for Him
I would have sung you
Tales of paradise
Of the Heaven where none die
And there are no more infants of Days
As He promised
My lullabies would have been hymns
Or treasonous little limericks
To force an infant smile
The soft whispers
That define Mornings
And give us back our names.
Instead I stand in
this shuddering moment
Purchasing an eternal garment
This Petite Dress.
I have chosen the white cotton
With the demure satin roses
White as fuller’s white
To dress you for your King
Surrendering what was not ours
To love but for moments
Choosing not to rage
At least for moments
At the small Garden
At the heart
We were not allowed to tend
At the heart, loved in distances
Yet ever near
Sung to in dreams and visions
Do you hear? As we hear?
Those hymns as tiny dresses
Thundering in our souls
When weeping pauses
And we hold you in a vision
The prisons of mourning
The dungeons
Where mourning mothers
Choose fierce Manacles
To remain at love’s door
A moment more?
And though my fingers grasp and ache
The baby garment strewn with
The fine embroidered smocking
Before it becomes
A bridal veil,
And the end of my heart
Before I must relinquish
Even my own garment
The tormented iron shackles of mourning
Before I let go
Here is my hymn,
I have already loved you
And will never cease
The breaking crescent of a thousand waves
Will be the counterpoint
Rushing into heaven
Where you have gone before
Dressed in His Glory
In Edenic Mercy
He already encompasses you
In Love greater than mine
(Though for the moment
I cannot embrace that wisdom)
My heart cry
Is Little One in the Petite Dress
Shining in the Holy Presence
Where small souls cry Abba, Father
I sing of your beauteous gown
And the one I shall wear
In Reunion soon,
When mourning flees
And we will recount in Joy
The wisdom of Eternity
Which escapes me
In this hour
Of the Petite Dress.
©2009 Elizabeth K. Best
-----------------------------
Mourning has a finer Thread
Mourning has a finer thread
Than mourners ever see
Runs contrary to the suffering Soul
And hides beneath the weave
Receiving blankets bathed in pale
Golden, pink and blue
Conceal the thread that none can bind
Yet pierce the heart straight through
That threaded shroud
That mocked the heart
A briared bassinet
It should have called to comfort rock
It called with Sorrow’s net
To fasten unsuspected there
The thorn which pierced His brow
The Crown that mocked
All Heaven’s King
Sits aching on mine now
Elizabeth k. best ©2009
Hope you like these. For general info, you can follow this blog, with an RSS feed.
Blessings this Spring day, although yesterday we still had snow in Wisconsin!.
Libbie Best
Saturday, December 6, 2008
Welcome to Forgotten Grief
delayed: will catch up shortly after the holidays.